No. 21-704

Oklahoma v. Samantha Ann Perales

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-11-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-15
Brief of respondent Samantha A. Perales in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-12-15
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Samantha A. Perales.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-12-10
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2021-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Samantha A. Perales
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent