No. 21-254
Oklahoma v. Jordan Batice Mitchell
Tags: criminal-procedure federalism judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-21
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-08
Brief amicus curiae of Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed.
2021-10-08
Brief of respondent Jordan B. Mitchell in opposition filed.
2021-10-08
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jordan B. Mitchell.
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 20, 2021.
2021-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2021 to October 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Jordan B. Mitchell
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Riyaz Amir Kanji — Kanji & Kantzen, PLLC, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner