1) is PETITIONER'S first amendment rights violated when
PRIVATE FOR PROFIT CORPORATION AND ITS AGENTS DENY
ACCESS TO THE PAPER NOTIFICATION of GRIEVANCE (NoG )
FORMS REQUIRED BY OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE(OAC)
5120-9-31(M) , now (L), MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLY
WITH OHIO REVISED CODE(ORC) 2969.26(A)(2) WHEN FILING
CIVIL ACTIONS IN STATE COURT

2) IS IT RETALIATION AGAINST PETITIONER WHEN PRIVATE FOR
PROFIT CORPORATION AND ITS AGENTS DENY ACCESS TO THE
PAPER NOTIFICATION of GRIEVANCE(NoG) FORMS REQUIRED
BY OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE(OAC) 5120-9-31 (M), now
(L), MAKING IT IMPOSSIBE TO COMPLY WITH OHIO REVISED
CODE (ORC ) 2969.26(A)(2) WHEN FILING CIVIL ACTIONS IN
STATE COURT?

3) IS IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN
STATE COURTS REFUSED TO APPLY THE ADMINISTRATIVE
EXHAUSTIVE REQUIREMENT EXCEPTION ESTABLISHED BY THIS
COURT'S DECISION IN Ross v. Blake, 136 S.Ct. 1850?

4) IS IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN
STATE COURTS REFUSED TO APPLY THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE
APPEAL AND REMEDIES REQUIREMENT EXCEPTION ESTABLISHED
BY THEIR HIGHEST COURT'S DECISION IN State ex rel. .
. 436 v. ted. Of County Comm'rs, Teamsters Local'Union No.
132 Ohio St.3d 47, 52, 20?

5) IS IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN
OHIO COURTS REFUSED TO APPLY THEIR PRINCIPLES OF STARE
DECISIS TO COMPLAINTS FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, Arnott V.
132 Ohio St.3d 401, fl10; Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc. : Arnott ,
132 Ohio St.3d 167, fl31?

6) IS IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN
OHIO COURTS REFUSED TO APPLY STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER, Ohio Revised Code(ORC) 2505.02(B),
TO THE PETITIONER?

7) is IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN OHIO COURTS
TO REFUSE TO APPLY THE OHIO CONSTITUIONA REQUIREMENTS FOR A
FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER, Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section
3(B)(2) TO THE PETITIONER?

8) IS IT AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION OF THE LAWS WHEN OHIO
COURTS IGNORES ITS PRECEDENTS THAT SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION
IS EXCLUSIVELY IN THE OHIO COURT CLAIMS WHEN THERE ARE MONEY
DAMAGES AGAINST "GOVERNMENT ENTITIES" and "EMPLOYEES," WHICH
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORP(MTC) HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE BOTH
A STATE INSTRUMENTALITY AND INSTITUTION, State ex rel. Dunlap
v. Sarko, 135 Ohio

Is petitioner's First Amendment rights violated when private for-profit corporation denies access to grievance forms required by law