1. Whether the inventor 's government-issued patent contract grant is protected
by the Constitution of the United States. If so,

2. Whether the inventor 's government-issued patent contract grant is impaired
by the acts of this Court or inferior Courts or USPTO/PTAB.

3. Whether the inventor 's government-issued patent contract grant is a contract
the obligation of which cannot be impaired without violating the Constitution
of the United States.

4. Whether any acts and Orders by the Judiciary that impair the obligation of the
patent grant contract within the meaning of the Constitution of the United
States "are consequently unconstitutional and void " and this Court must
declare them void.

5. Whether the rescinding acts by the Judiciary have left inventors without a
remedy for a crime committed by the adjudicators by their Orders which
unconstitutionally impaired the patent grant contract with inventors, which
this Court 's own STARE DECISIS 1 Law of the Case and Law of the Land found
a contract that the grant should not be revoked, for which inventors are
entitled to Constitutional redress.

6. Whether this Court must enforce this Court 's own STARE DECISIS Law of
the Case and Law of the Land — prohibition of the Constitution mandated by
this Court against repudiating government-issued grants of any kind even by
the highest authority without just compensation, delineated, in the famous
case of Fletcher v. Peck, (Et. Seq. 1810); herein, 'THE FLETCHER
CHALLENGE. ' — even if Judges and Justices recuse or lose their jurisdiction
bv breach of solemn oaths of office.

7. Whether breach of solemn oaths of office by the Judiciary not enforcing this
Court 's own STARE DECISIS Law of the Case and Law of the Land —
prohibition of the Constitution mandated by this Court against repudiating
government-issued grants of any kind even by the highest authority without
just compensation, robbing the inventor of color of significant inventions that
have enabled the nation to function remotely during the COVID-19 Pandemic,
is a breach of public trust and violates the Equal Protection and Due Process
Clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.

8. Whether this Court has anything to act upon hut enforce the Supreme Law of
the Land, as declared by Chief Justice John Marshall in Fletcher v. Peck, 10
U.S. 87 (1810) "A grant is a contract that cannot be repudiated by the highest
authority; " Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819):
"The law of this case is the law of all... applies to contracts of every
description...; " Grant u. Raymond, 31 U.S. 218 (1832); and U.S. v. American
Bell Telephone Company, 167 U.S. 224 (1897).

Whether the inventor's government-issued patent contract grant is protected by the Constitution of the United States