No. 22-1174
Michael Erwine v. Churchill County, Nevada, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: due-process employment employment-discrimination ninth-circuit procedural-due-process public-employee public-employee-rights stare-decisis stigma-plus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
To state a viable "stigma-plus" claim, must a plaintiff prove as a matter of fact "effective exclusion" from a chosen profession?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
To state a viable 'stigma-plus' claim, must a plaintiff prove as a matter of fact 'effective exclusion' from a chosen profession?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Churchill County, Nevada, et al. to respond filed.
2023-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Churchill County, Nevada, et al.
Katherine Parks — Thorndal Armstrong, PC, Respondent
MIchael Erwine
Luke Andrew Busby — Luke Andrew Busby, Ltd., Petitioner