No. 21-645

Oklahoma v. Chandler Kyle Ned

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-11-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-16
Brief of respondent Chandler K. Ned in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-12-16
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Chandler K. Ned.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2021.
2021-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to December 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2021-11-23
Brief amicus curiae of Chickasaw Nation filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2021-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Chandler K. Ned
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Chickasaw Nation
Frank Sharp Holleman IV — Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner