Whether to apply Federal Constitution: XAl bad behavior-after-petitioned speech to impeach hearsay -stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated ("MCA ") in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: ("JTV-DP-R ") on State Officials canceling RickLUSSY Non-Lawyer Pro Se same docket caption Third Party Claim-Amended, Adding Parties to make moot: respondent 's buffaloing this court, not having done their homework to foist bogus remittitur "affirm Summary Dismissal, " $74,000 Judgment-&-brand-new unnoticed "vexatious " litigant " that ignores clerk default for court $90,001 judgment favoring RickLUSSY in civil Rico Frauds on Pro Se Court by Pro Se Officials of Court •' fact decision jury verdict not judgitis-bias of American Bar Association ("ABA ") paid dues for unregistered lobbyist sabotage. "Rule 10 serves a compelling government interest to reduce government corruption, 8-priorCounty Appraisal & 8/18/2020 election remedy: a fragile democratic check & balance.

[B-part] Whether allow Ra v v Blair to-suppress juror-voter-electorate verdict.

[C-part] Whether State Supreme Court officials transformed complaint into memorandum of law is itself a groundless non-binding: stare decisis pleading, no U.S. Constitution-compliance: 11-Constitutional Issues, 27-Issues of First Impression for impeachment. And to certify statute challenge, 3-property tax appeals & destroyedMother 's Living Trust-To-Be Last-Will-&-Testament etc. in one constitutional question.

Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated (MCA) in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: ("JTV-DP-R")"