| 24A438 |
Montana, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Montana, et al. |
Montana |
2024-11-01 |
Presumed Complete |
|
abortion due-process fourteenth-amendment medical-decision-making minor-rights parental-consent |
Question not identified. |
| 24-57 |
Coalition Life v. City of Carbondale, Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-07-18 |
Denied |
Amici (11)Relisted (9) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process first-amendment free-speech public-debate public-forum supreme-court-precedent |
Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. Colorado. |
| 23A470 |
Idaho v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-11-27 |
Presumed Complete |
Amici (5) |
abortion emergency-medical-treatment federal-preemption medical-procedure preliminary-injunction state-law |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in vacating a panel stay of a preliminary injunction that enjoins Idaho's Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortio… |
| 23-5856 |
Dmt MacTruong, aka Mac Truong v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-10-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abortion civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights copyright copyright-law federal-jurisdiction obstruction-of-justice standing texas-heartbeat-act |
Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas… |
| 23-395 |
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-10-16 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
abortion abortion-medication administrative-procedure-act drug-regulation fda fda-approval generic-drugs medical-safety mifepristone subpart-h |
1. Whether Cross-Petitioners' challenge to FDA's 2000 mifepristone approval is timely.
2. Whether FDA's 2000 approval of mifepristone under Subpart H… |
| 23-235 |
Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-09-12 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (3) |
abortion abortion-medication administrative-law agency-action article-iii-standing civil-procedure fda fda-regulations mifepristone preliminary-relief standing |
1. Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions.
2. Whether FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and … |
| 23-74 |
Debra A. Vitagliano v. County of Westchester, New York |
Second Circuit |
2023-07-25 |
Denied |
Amici (18)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-clinic-protests constitutional-law content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech precedent public-forum stare-decisis |
The question presented is whether the Court should overrule Hill. |
| 22-7800 |
Mac Truong v. Richard Michael DeWine, Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-06-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech intellectual-property pro-se-litigation standing standing-doctrine |
Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of… |
| 22-7743 |
Mac Truong v. Kevin Stitt, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-violation copyright copyright-law due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech standing |
Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of … |
| 22-1135 |
Center for Medical Progress, et al. v. National Abortion Federation |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-05-22 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
abortion abortion-debate civil-rights constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech prior-restraint public-debate public-discourse |
Is the district court's suppression of speech about a high-profile and highly charged issue of public debate an unconstitutional prior restraint? |
| 22-951 |
Jane Doe No. 1, et al. v. Todd Rokita, Attorney General of Indiana, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-03-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-law dobbs-precedent dobbs-v-jackson first-amendment free-exercise free-speech medical-protocols religious-beliefs |
Whether, following Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022), this Court's First Amendment precedents continue to apply to … |
| 22-794 |
Eurica Califorrniaa v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2023-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
abortion civil-rights dobbs-v-jackson due-process patent-law patent-term roe-v-wade specification-claims unborn-rights vuitch vuitch-precedent |
1. Whether United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62 (1971), should be overruled in favor of equality with the unborn?
2. Whether 37 C.F.R. § 1.704(c)(10)… |
| 22-5688 |
Michael G. Peters v. David Hittner, Judge, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-09-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion civil-rights constitutional-rights declaratory-relief due-process free-speech injunctive-relief judicial-interpretation legal-standing procedural-law standing |
Question not identified. |
| 22-201 |
Jane Doe, as Parent and Next Friend of Baby Mary Doe, et al. v. Daniel McKee, Governor of Rhode Island, et al. |
Rhode Island |
2022-09-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abortion constitutional-rights constitutional-standing dobbs-precedent dobbs-v-jackson due-process equal-protection history-and-tradition prenatal-life standing unborn-rights |
1. Whether, in light of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's
Health Organization, 597 U.S. __ (2022), the
Rhode Island Supreme Court erred in holding that
the unb… |
| 21-962 |
In Re Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
|
2022-01-04 |
Denied |
|
abortion civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process fifth-circuit judicial-procedure mandamus remand standing texas writ-of-certiorari |
When this case was before the Court on a writ of certiorari before judgment, this Court "effectively [stood] in the shoes of the Court of Appeals" and… |
| 21-582 |
Mark Lee Dickson v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review reproductive-rights severability standing stare-decisis state-law supreme-court-precedent |
1. Should the Court overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)?
2. Should th… |
| 21-583 |
Stephen Brint Carlton, et al. v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent texas-law |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-587 |
Penny Clarkston v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-463 |
Whole Woman's Health, et al. v. Austin Reeve Jackson, Judge, District Court of Texas, 114th District, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-28 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (9) |
abortion abortion-law civil-enforcement civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-review sovereign-immunity standing state-legislation |
The question presented is whether a State can insulate from federal-court review a law that prohibits the exercise of a constitutional right by delega… |
| 21-3 |
Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. v. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-07-02 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights down-syndrome due-process eugenic eugenic-abortion gestational-age reproductive-rights roe-v-wade state-regulation |
Missouri's House Bill 126 ("HB 126"), enacted in 2019, prohibits medical providers from performing abortions when the provider knows that the sole rea… |
| 20-1501 |
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, et al. v. Shirin Emami, Acting Superintendent, New York Department of Financial Services, et al. |
New York |
2021-04-27 |
GVR |
Amici (6)Relisted (4) |
abortion abortion-mandate employment-division-smith first-amendment free-exercise free-exercise-clause free-speech health-insurance religious-autonomy religious-exemption smith-v-oregon |
In 2017, New York promulgated a regulation mandating that employer health insurance plans cover abortions. N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 11, § 52.1… |
| 20-1434 |
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al. v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-04-13 |
GVR |
Amici (8)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights disability down-syndrome due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment medical-ethics prenatal-diagnosis selective-abortion state-prohibition |
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment bars States from prohibiting abortions that are sought solely because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. |
| 20-1375 |
Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-04-01 |
GVR |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights best-interests civil-rights constitutional-privacy constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bypass minor-consent minors parental-notification parental-rights |
When a court permits an unemancipated minor to
have an abortion, may the State require that her parents be notified before the abortion occurs except
… |
| 20-7345 |
Willie Ray Lewis v. Robert Legrand, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abortion appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-review due-process equal-protection judicial-procedure legal-standing medical-regulations standing statutory-interpretation |
I) Whether Trial counsel's failune to inwestigate interview, or loss-examine thealleged Victims, Pretrial, Whenshe was inossession of a resantationtaf… |
| 20-6653 |
Scott P. Roeder v. Kansas |
Kansas |
2020-12-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-review personhood roe-v-wade standing |
Whether the notion of overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), includes other possibilities besides leaving abortion up to the states?
Whether t… |
| 20-482 |
Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General of Tennessee, et al. v. Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-10-14 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge covid-19 covid-19-order executive-order medical-procedures mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing |
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), this Court should vacate the Sixth Circuit's judgment and remand with ins… |
| 20-454 |
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Granted |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
abortion abortion-referrals administrative-law agency-rulemaking family-planning rust-v-sullivan statutory-interpretation title-x |
1. Whether the rule falls within the agency's statutory authority.
2. Whether the rule is the product of reasoned decisionmaking. |
| 20-385 |
Judy Doe v. Michael L. Parson, Governor of Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge due-process establishment-clause free-exercise free-exercise-clause religious-belief religious-liberty undue-burden undue-burden-standard |
1. Is the Establishment Clause violated by
the proclamation in an abortion statute that "The life of
each human being begins at conception. Abortion w… |
| 20-305 |
Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, et al. v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
abortion abortion-rights constitutional-rights covid-19 due-process executive-order judicial-review mandamus mootness |
The Governor of Texas, in reliance on the COVID 19 pandemic, issued an executive order that banned nearly all abortions in Texas for at least a month,… |
| 20-93 |
Jane Doe, a Minor Child Who is Unborn, By and Through Her Father and Next Friend, John Doe v. Mike Hunter, Attorney General of Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
|
abortion due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-precedent levy-v-louisiana roe-v-wade standing traceability unborn-children |
Classed by law as a 'less-than,' and treated for some purposes as property rather than a person, Petitioner Baby Jane seeks constitutional equality un… |
| 19-1392 |
Thomas E. Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-06-18 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (141)Relisted (22) |
abortion civil-rights constitutional-challenge dignity-of-unborn due-process health medical-profession medical-profession-protection pre-viability-abortion standing third-party-standing undue-burden-standard women's-health |
1. Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective
abortions are unconstitutional.
2. Whether the validity of a pre-viability law that
protects wo… |
| 19-1040 |
March for Life Education and Defense Fund v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-20 |
GVR |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
abortion administrative-law article-iii-standing civil-rights contraception contraceptive-mandate due-process federal-regulations healthcare healthcare-coverage moral-objection moral-objections religious-exemption standing |
1. Whether states have Article III standing to challenge the religious and moral exemptions based on a hypothetical increase in their discretionary, v… |
| 19-816 |
Kristina Box, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-12-27 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-bypass minor-consent minors parental-consent parental-notification standing third-party-standing |
For decades Indiana has permitted a minor to have an abortion so long as she has parental consent or a bypass order from a juvenile court based on eit… |
| 19-743 |
Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, et al. v. Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-12-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
14th-amendment abortion abortion-clinic-licensing civil-rights due-process federal-injunction fourteenth-amendment hypothetical-patient-rights licensing rooker-feldman sovereign-immunity standing state-agency-review third-party-standing undue-burden |
When Respondent Whole Woman's Health applied for a license to open a new abortion clinic in South Bend but refused to supply documentation of past com… |
| 19-417 |
EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C., et al. v. Adam Meier |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
abortion circuit-conflict circuit-split compelled-speech constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech informed-consent medical-consent physician-autonomy ultrasound ultrasound-law |
The Kentucky Ultrasound Informed Consent Act (House Bill 2) requires a physician, while performing a pre-abortion ultrasound, to (i) describe the ultr… |
| 19-5044 |
Adrian Moon v. California |
California |
2019-07-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
abortion civil-rights constitutional-law due-process precedent standing standing-civil-procedure-due-process-takings-civil |
Devil violates natural and
Where SATAN the
Car drer
Law and
rule annouved in New
Kug James Version(deorae lll) "Palsns 105:15
Do not touch
y
harm my p… |
| 18-1516 |
Veronica Price, et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-06-06 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-clinic buffer-zone civil-rights content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech narrow-tailoring precedent speech-restriction |
Chicago has made it a crime for a speaker to approach within eight feet of another person "for the purpose of passing a leaflet or handbill, displayin… |
| 18-1460 |
Stephen Russo, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals v. June Medical Services L.L.C., et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-05-23 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (4) |
abortion abortion-providers abortion-regulations civil-rights due-process health-and-safety-regulations health-regulations health-safety-law legal-standing patient-relationship patient-rights patient-standing prudential-standing standing third-party third-party-standing |
1. Can abortion providers be presumed to have third-party standing to challenge health and safety regulations on behalf of their patients absent a "cl… |
| 18-1323 |
June Medical Services L.L.C., et al. v. Stephen Russo, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-04-19 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (20) |
abortion abortion-rights admitting-privileges constitutional-law due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent undue-burden whole-woman's-health whole-womans-health womens-health |
Whether the Fifth Circuit's decision upholding Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hosp… |
| 18-837 |
Scott Harris, in His Official Capacity as State Health Officer, et al. v. West Alabama Women's Center, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (11) |
abortion abortion-ban abortion-rights constitutional-challenge dismemberment due-process gonzales-v-carhart medical-debate medical-procedure partial-birth-abortion reproductive-rights state-law state-regulation unborn-child |
Whether a state ban on dismemberment abortions is unconstitutional where there is a reasonable medical debate that alternatives to the banned procedur… |
| 18-483 |
Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-10-16 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (14)Relisted (15) |
14th-amendment abortion civil-rights disability due-process equal-protection fetal-remains medical-regulation |
1. Whether a State may require health care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremat… |