| 25A234 |
South Carolina, et al. v. John Doe, By His Next Friends and Parents, Jim Doe and Jane Doe |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-08-28 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
equal-protection gender-affirming-care legislative-act medical-treatment sovereignty title-x |
Question not identified. |
| 24A146 |
Oklahoma v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
|
abortion-referral dobbs-decision federal-funding spending-clause title-x weldon-amendment |
(1) Whether HHS is violating the Constitution's Spending Clause by imposing a funding condition—abortion referrals—that this Court's precedent (Rust) … |
| 20-539 |
Oregon, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-23 |
Granted |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-procedure-act affordable-care-act healthcare-access medical-ethics patient-provider-communication reproductive-healthcare title-x |
For fifty years, the federal government has funded family-planning and reproductive healthcare services for low-income and underserved patients throug… |
| 20-454 |
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Granted |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
abortion abortion-referrals administrative-law agency-rulemaking family-planning rust-v-sullivan statutory-interpretation title-x |
1. Whether the rule falls within the agency's statutory authority.
2. Whether the rule is the product of reasoned decisionmaking. |
| 20-429 |
American Medical Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-05 |
Granted |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-law affordable-care-act arbitrary-and-capricious family-planning free-speech hhs-rule medical-ethics patient-communication reproductive-health title-x |
1. Whether the Rule is arbitrary and capricious.
2. Whether the Rule violates the Title X appropriations act, which requires that "all pregnancy coun… |