| 24-113 |
John J. Dierlam v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-08-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affordable-care-act civil-rights-standing-mootness-due-process-janus-v constitutional-rights mootness religious-exemption standing state-actor |
1) Is it a proper exercise of discretion for an Appeals Court to sanction raising the bar presented by the elements of standing and mootness to a virt… |
| 24-90 |
William Crouch, in His Official Capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al. v. Shauntae Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-07-29 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
affordable-care-act equal-protection gender-dysphoria medicaid-act medical-coverage non-discrimination sex-discrimination transgender-status |
1. Whether West Virginia violated the Equal Protection Clause by declining to cover surgical treatments for gender dysphoria; and
2. Whether West Vir… |
| 22-7885 |
Antwon Whitten v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-06-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affordable-care-act civil-rights due-process free-speech standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1010 |
Tracy Nix v. Advanced Urology Institute of Georgia, P.C. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-01-18 |
Denied |
|
affordable-care-act civil-rights discrimination-claim effective-communication intentional-discrimination nominal-damages rehabilitation-act spending-clause |
Whether a discrimination plaintiff who can prove a legal violation is entitled to an award of nominal damages under Spending Clause legislation. |
| 21-379 |
Texas, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Relisted (9) |
administrative-law affordable-care-act agency-rule medicaid-rates nondelegation-doctrine private-entity rulemaking-authority statute-of-limitations |
(1) Whether an agency rule delegating rulemaking authority to a private entity violates the nondelegation doctrine.
(2) Whether the statute of limita… |
| 21-208 |
Merrilee Stewart v. IHT Insurance Agency Group, LLC Welfare Benefits Plan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-08-12 |
Denied |
|
affordable-care-act americans-with-disabilities-act arbitration civil-rights constitutional-protections disability-rights due-process employment-law erisa privacy |
Before an employee may have been deemed to have waived the comprehensive rights, remedies and procedural protections prescribed in civil rights statut… |
| 20-1536 |
United States v. Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated |
Federal Circuit |
2021-05-04 |
Denied |
|
affordable-care-act appropriations cost-sharing-reduction cost-sharing-reductions government-appropriation health-insurance-exchange implied-remedy money-damages premium-tax-credit premium-tax-credits |
Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Congress intended to afford insurers an implied money-damages remedy as compensation for CSR pay… |
| 20-1432 |
United States v. Maine Community Health Options, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-04-13 |
Denied |
|
affordable-care-act appropriations cost-sharing-reduction cost-sharing-reductions government-liability implied-damages implied-right-of-action premium-tax-credits statutory-interpretation |
Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Congress intended to afford insurers an implied money damages remedy as compensation for CSR pay… |
| 20-1393 |
William Henry Keehn, II v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-04-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affordable-care-act civil-rights commerce-clause due-process standing taxing-clause |
Does a district court have authority under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to recharacterize a district court's Motion when it Challenges a district court's … |
| 20-1374 |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al. v. John Doe, One, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-31 |
Granted |
Amici (21)Relisted (2) |
affordable-care-act antidiscrimination-statute civil-rights disability-discrimination disparate-impact health-insurance insurance patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act rehabilitation-act |
1. Whether section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and by extension the ACA, provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disabi… |
| 20-1200 |
Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
affordable-care-act contract-law cost-sharing-reduction cost-sharing-reduction-payments government-liability government-obligation mitigation-defense statutory-interpretation |
May the United States invoke a non-statutory mitigation defense to avoid the unambiguous requirement of section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Aff… |
| 20-1162 |
Maine Community Health Options, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-02-23 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
affordable-care-act breach-of-contract contract-law contract-law-analogy cost-sharing-reduction government-liability government-obligation shall-pay-command statutory-interpretation |
Whether the government is required to pay insurers the full amount of the cost-sharing reduction payments required by the unambiguous shall-pay langua… |
| 20-946 |
John J. Dierlam v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-01-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
1st-amendment affordable-care-act civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech religious-exemptions rfra |
1)Do one or more Constitutional violations exist in the ACA? Subsidiary to this question and suggested by the Claims in the Complaint and subsequent p… |
| 20-539 |
Oregon, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-23 |
Granted |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-procedure-act affordable-care-act healthcare-access medical-ethics patient-provider-communication reproductive-healthcare title-x |
For fifty years, the federal government has funded family-planning and reproductive healthcare services for low-income and underserved patients throug… |
| 20-429 |
American Medical Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-05 |
Granted |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-law affordable-care-act arbitrary-and-capricious family-planning free-speech hhs-rule medical-ethics patient-communication reproductive-health title-x |
1. Whether the Rule is arbitrary and capricious.
2. Whether the Rule violates the Title X appropriations act, which requires that "all pregnancy coun… |
| 20-219 |
Jane Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-08-25 |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (10)Relisted (3) |
affordable-care-act antidiscrimination-law civil-rights civil-rights-act compensatory-damages emotional-distress federal-funding rehabilitation-act title-vi |
Whether the compensatory damages available
under Title VI and the statutes that incorporate its
remedies include compensation for emotional distress. |
| 19-1415 |
John J. Dierlam v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-06-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
1st-amendment affordable-care-act civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-association healthcare-mandate religious-freedom religious-freedom-restoration-act rfra |
1)Do one or more Constitutional violations exist in the ACA? Subsidiary to this question and suggested by the Claims in the Complaint and subsequent p… |
| 19-1053 |
Little Sisters of the Poor Jeanne Jugan Residence v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-25 |
GVR |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
affordable-care-act contraception contraceptive-coverage federal-regulation health-insurance health-plans regulatory-authority regulatory-requirement religious-exemption religious-freedom-restoration-act rfra standing |
Whether the federal government lawfully exempted religious objectors from the regulatory requirement to provide health plans that include contraceptiv… |
| 19-1038 |
Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-19 |
GVR |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law affordable-care-act conscience-exemption contraceptive-coverage contraceptive-mandate health-insurance preventive-services religious-freedom-restoration-act |
Whether the agencies had statutory authority under the ACA and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq., to expand the … |
| 19-1019 |
Texas, et al. v. California, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-02-14 |
Judgment Issued |
|
affordable-care-act affordable-care-act-aca congress congressional-intent constitutional-interpretation due-process health-insurance individual-mandate severability standing tax |
1. Whether the unconstitutional individual mandate to purchase minimum essential coverage is severable from the remainder of the ACA.
2. Whether the … |
| 19-841 |
United States House of Representatives v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-01-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3) |
affordable-care-act article-iii article-iii-standing congress-power congressional-authority constitutional-challenge severability standing tax-provision taxation |
In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), this Court upheld 26 U.S.C. 5000A, a provision of the Affordable Care… |
| 19-840 |
California, et al. v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-01-03 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (14)Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
affordable-care-act article-iii-standing congress-power constitutional-challenge due-process minimum-coverage-provision severability standing tax-power taxation |
1. Whether the individual and state plaintiffs in this case have established Article III standing to challenge the minimum coverage provision in Secti… |
| 19-454 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-10-07 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
administrative-procedure-act affordable-care-act agency-rulemaking conscience-exemption contraceptive-coverage contraceptive-mandate healthcare-mandate nationwide-injunction religious-freedom-restoration-act standing statutory-authority |
1. Whether the agencies had statutory authority under the ACA and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq., to expand t… |
| 19-431 |
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-10-02 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (11)Relisted (2) |
administrative-law administrative-rule affordable-care-act contraceptive-coverage injunction intervene nationwide-injunction religious-freedom-restoration-act standing standing-to-appeal |
Since 2011, federal courts have repeatedly considered whether forcing religious objectors to provide health plans that include contraceptive coverage … |
| 18-8780 |
John T. Higgins v. Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance |
First Circuit |
2019-04-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
affordable-care-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process health-care individual-mandate standing |
Question not identified. |
| 18-1038 |
Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company, an Illinois Nonprofit Mutual Insurance Corporation v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-07 |
Judgment Issued |
Relisted (2) |
affordable-care-act appropriations appropriations-riders government-contracts government-obligations legislative-history money-mandating-statute retroactive-abrogation retroactive-application risk-corridors |
Whether a temporary cap on appropriations availability from certain specified funding sources may be construed, based on its legislative history, to a… |
| 18-523 |
W. A. Griffin v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affordable-care-act anti-assignment-clause anti-assignment-clauses assignment-of-benefits civil-rights discrimination federal-financial-assistance good-old-boys-club plan-administration provider-standing section-1557 standing third-party-administrator |
Whether or not it can be reasonably inferred that plan administrators are liable for discrimination under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act when… |