No. 20-1393

William Henry Keehn, II v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: affordable-care-act civil-rights commerce-clause due-process standing taxing-clause
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a district court have authority under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to recharacterize a district court's Motion when it Challenges a district court's Subject matter Jurisdiction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in upholding the district court's dismissal of petitioner's claims challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate under the Commerce Clause and the Taxing Clause of the U.S. Constitution

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
William Keehn
William Henry Keehn II — Petitioner