1)Do one or more Constitutional violations exist in the ACA? Subsidiary to this question and suggested by the Claims in the Complaint and subsequent papers are multiple violations which may require the court to decide such questions as:
a)Does the HHS Mandate violate one or more of the RFRA, the 1st amendment, or equal protection?
i
b)Do the religious Exemptions in the ACA violate RFRA, the 1st amendment, or due process?
c)Does the ACA violate freedom of association, privacy rights, equal protection, or due process?

2)Does the Constitutional violations of the ACA constitute a law which is so corrupt, "unreasonable" and "capricious" as to goals and implementation to make it unseverable?

3)Can the principle of the Consent of the Governed be restored to some degree by a declaration properly defining "direct tax" and "consent of the governed?"

Do one or more Constitutional violations exist in the ACA?