No. 21-1010
Tracy Nix v. Advanced Urology Institute of Georgia, P.C.
Tags: affordable-care-act civil-rights discrimination-claim effective-communication intentional-discrimination nominal-damages rehabilitation-act spending-clause
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a discrimination plaintiff who can prove a legal violation is entitled to an award of nominal damages under Spending Clause legislation.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a discrimination plaintiff who can prove a legal violation is entitled to an award of nominal damages under Spending Clause legislation
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-29
Reply of petitioner Tracy Nix filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-15
Brief of respondent Advanced Urology Institute of Georgia in opposition filed.
2022-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 21, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
2022-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2022 to March 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Advanced Urology Institute of Georgia
Tracy Nix
Andrew Rozynski — Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, Petitioner