No. 19-1019
Texas, et al. v. California, et al.
Tags: affordable-care-act affordable-care-act-aca congress congressional-intent constitutional-interpretation due-process health-insurance individual-mandate severability standing tax
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
Related Cases:
19-840
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the unconstitutional individual mandate to purchase minimum essential coverage is severable from the remainder of the ACA.
2. Whether the district court properly declared the ACA invalid in its entirety and unenforceable anywhere.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unconstitutional individual mandate to purchase minimum essential coverage is severable from the remainder of the ACA
Docket Entries
2021-07-19
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-09-10
The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
2020-09-02
CIRCULATED
2020-08-31
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.
2020-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-19
Letter of February 19, 2020 from counsel for respondent State of California filed.
2020-02-18
Letter of February 18, 2020 from counsel for respondent U.S. House of Representatives filed.
2020-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2020)
Attorneys
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
David Meir Zionts — Covington & Burlington LLP, Amicus
Service Employees International Union, et al.
State of California
Samuel Passchier Siegel — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Texas, et al.
Judd Edward Stone II — Texas Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
United States
United States House of Representatives
Douglas Neal Letter — Respondent