No. 22-5688
Michael G. Peters v. David Hittner, Judge, et al.
Tags: abortion civil-rights constitutional-rights declaratory-relief due-process free-speech injunctive-relief judicial-interpretation legal-standing procedural-law standing
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the courts below erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of a state statute that prohibits certain speech related to abortion services
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner