No. 20-482
Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General of Tennessee, et al. v. Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al.
Tags: abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge covid-19 covid-19-order executive-order medical-procedures mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing
Latest Conference:
2021-01-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), this Court should vacate the Sixth Circuit's judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss as moot the abortion providers' constitutional challenge to the now-expired executive order.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit's judgment should be vacated and remanded as moot under Munsingwear
Docket Entries
2021-02-26
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-01-25
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit with instructions to direct the District Court to vacate as moot its April 17, 2020, order granting plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).
2021-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2021-01-11
Rescheduled.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-23
Reply of petitioners Herbert H. Slatery III, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-14
Brief of respondents Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al. in opposition filed.
2020-11-12
Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.
2020-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020.
2020-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al.
Autumn Chandra Katz — Center for Reproductive Rights, Respondent
Ally Financial Inc.
American Center for Law and Justice
Jay Alan Sekulow — Amicus
Herbert H. Slatery III, et al.