Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in vacating a panel stay of a preliminary injunction that enjoins Idaho's Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortion except when necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman, on the ground that the Act conflicts with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, and whether Idaho is likely to succeed on the merits of its argument that it is not impossible to comply with both EMTALA and Idaho law, and that Idaho law does not pose a substantial obstacle to EMTALA's purpose.

Whether a state may enforce a law restricting certain medical procedures related to abortion when such law conflicts with federal emergency medical treatment requirements