"Whether, in accordance with the doctrine of "stare decisis", the Panel upon which review is sought is required to adhere to the binding precedents made by the previous panel on exactly the same legal issues presented? and,

"Whether, in accordance with the Third Circuit's I.0.P. Rule 9.1, the Panel upon which review is sought is required to acquire the approval of a majority of the en banc court in order to overrule the decisions already made by the previous panel on exactly the same legal issues presented?

Whether the doctrine of stare decisis requires an appellate panel to adhere to binding precedents from a previous panel on identical legal issues or obtain en banc approval to overturn such precedents