No. 23-223
Charles J. Jenkins v. TriWest Healthcare Alliance, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights court-procedure due-process federal-circuit federal-courts judicial-authority judicial-review rule-56 separation-of-powers stare-decisis sua-sponte
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the triumvirate overstepped their
authority when they decided (sua sponte) to invoke,
incite, insurrect, or for the lack of a better descrip
tion "A Coup, or a Coup * eta? which appears as a
overthrow of the lower court 's regime by essentially
usurping their authority and violating the Doctrine
of Stare Decisis ?
2. Whether the lower court 's Rule 56 decision
can be Invalidated by the (Federal Circuit(s)) as akin
to the Wakefield petition and Virentem case whereby
those claims were invalidated and in its stead replaced
them with a negative decisions or stamp the single
word ("AFFIRM ")?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-triumvirate-overstepped-their-authority
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Brief of respondent TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp. in opposition filed.
2023-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Charles Jenkins
Charles J. Jenkins — Petitioner
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.
Jason Robert Scheiderer — Dentons US LLP, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent