No. 21-488

Oklahoma v. Dakota Shay Fox

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty oklahoma-statehood stare-decisis tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2021-10-29
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Dakota Shay Fox.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-10-29
Brief of respondent Dakota Shay Fox in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-10-28
Brief amicus curiae of Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2021)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Frank Sharp Holleman IV — Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, Amicus
Dakota Shay Fox
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner