Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad behavior-after-petitioned speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated ("MCA") in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: ("JTV-DP-R") on State Officials canceling RickLUSSY Non-Lawyer Pro Se same docket caption Third Party Claim-Amended, Adding Parties to make moot: respondent's buffaloing this court, not having done their homework to foist bogus remittitur "affirm Summary Dismissal," $74,000 Judgment-&-brand-new unnoticed, not argued "vexatious" litigant" in civil Rico Fraud to disgorge $1,258,877 public salaries, intentional vitiation of ministerial Oath Of Office contract without discretion for 100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress ("JTV-DP-R") with no judgitis-bias. The American Bar Association ("ABA") paid dues for unregistered lobbyist 24/7 sabotage. "Rule 10 serves a compelling government interest to reduce government corruption, 8-prior-County Appraisal now entering: August 18, 2020 election remedy: a fragile democratic check & balance.

[B-part] Whether allow Ray v Blair to-suppress juror-voter-electorate verdict.

[C-part] Whether State Supreme Court officials transformed complaint into memorandum of law is itself a groundless non-binding: stare decisis pleading, no U.S. Constitution-compliance: 11-Constitutional Issues, 27-Issues of First Impression for impeachment. And to certify statute challenge, 3-property tax appeals & destroyed-Mother's Living Trust-To-Be Last-Will-&-Testament etc. in one constitutional question.

Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated