Whether probable Cause to effect a laarrantless Seizure, of a vehicle is equivalent to officers Wnaoledge of an arrestee, being its Oujner ?Respondents did not possess fads to reasonably LoorraiiV

Ldhdher a dog sniff - and warrant-based .search resulting 'from its positive alert- Con be performed on a Vehicle Loarrant' Ircy^lj s>i7ed on nothing mcme than officers' hncioledge. of on Oure^tee being its ouJner ?

Whether O full, fair and impartial hearing is afforded uohen pe.- Cedent (uunder the doctrine. of Stare, decisis) requiring uuarrant' less Seizure, of vehicles to be based on a reasonable belief tho3 the Vehicle Contains Contraband or evidence: of Crime, or that it is or> indrument or evidence of Crime is deviated from absent Compelling reasons or a Change in laio 2

Whether probable cause to effect a warrantless seizure of a vehicle is equivalent to officers' knowledge of an arrestee being its owner?