No. 21-257
Oklahoma v. Jimmie Dewayne Starr
Tags: 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-procedure criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-15
Brief amicus curiae of Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed.
2021-10-15
Brief of respondent Jimmie D. Starr in opposition filed.
2021-10-15
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jimmie D. Starr.
2021-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2021.
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-09-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2021 to October 22, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Jimmie D. Starr
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Riyaz Amir Kanji — Kanji & Kantzen, PLLC, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner