Whether this U.S.S. Ct. will certify the conflict of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, not only with itself concerning its ruling that subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time s (U.S. V Adesida 129 f.3d 846 6th. Circuit 1997) but with all other federal courts of appeals, and this U.S.S. Ct. decision in Clover V Gary t4cCaughtry 2010 U.S. Briefs 1114; 2011 U.S.S. Ct. Briefs Lexis 3133.

Whether this U.S.S. Ct. will provide pro se petitioner Harry Eugene Briscoe the due process and equal protection rights of all case law incorporated herein concerning the scheme to a subject-matter jurisdiction claim it provided in Glover V Gary McCoughtry, Warden— respondent (no. 10114) Supreme Court of The United States. 2010 U.S. Briefs 1114; 2011 U.S.S. Ct. Briefs Lexis 3133.

Whether the doctrine of stare decisis apply to petitioner Harry Eugene Briscoe seeking relief from a void conviction under Constitutional mandates already established by the U.S.S. Ct. in Glover V McCaughtry, Warden—respondent.

Whether this present petition should be liberally contrue as an original request for a writ of habeas corpus by this court, because extraordinary circumstances exists for his immediate release from 'a void judge—ment.

Whether this U.S.S. Ct. will certify the conflict of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals