No. 21-805
Douglas Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, et al.
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights common-law court-rules due-process judicial-precedent precedent stare-decisis unpublished-opinions
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is Nevada Supreme Court Rule 36 allowing appellate decisions to be unpublished and unable to the cited as precedent a violation of the rule of stare decisis and of the common law?
2. Is the miscitation and sophism used in the dismissal for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be based in the case of Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, Vazeen and Casse a paradigm of why appellate court cases need to be published and cited as precedent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Nevada Supreme Court Rule 36 allowing appellate decisions to be unpublished and unable to the cited as precedent a violation of the rule of stare decisis and of the common law?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Douglas Norberg
Douglas Norberg — Petitioner