No. 21-486
Oklahoma v. Dakota James Alleyn Shriver
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-jurisdiction native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-law oklahoma-sovereignty precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-08
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-24
Brief of respondent Dakota James Alleyn Shriver in opposition filed.
2021-11-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Dakota James Alleyn Shriver.
2021-11-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 1, 2021.
2021-10-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 1, 2021 to December 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-28
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Dakota James Alleyn Shriver
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
State of Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner