| 24-619 |
Igor Lukashin v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-12-05 |
Denied |
|
argument-waiver due-process judicial-proceedings ninth-circuit pre-filing-review pro-se-appellant |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit has continued
to deny Due Process by applying a
purportedly categorical, Ramirez-
Aleiandre v. Ashcroft , 320 F.3d 858… |
| 23-7007 |
Howard T. Tyson, Sr. v. Kris Y. Lee, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2024-03-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence-standard judicial-orders judicial-procedure motion-to-dismiss pleadings pro-se-appellant standing |
1. WHY DOES THE COURTS FAIL TO FOLLOW OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME
COURT WICH SAYS. WHEN A PRO SE APPELLANT ARE FACES WITH A MOTION TO
DISMISS. IT IS APPRO… |
| 23-5972 |
Barney A. Dunlap v. David Mitchell, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-11-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdictional-statement notice-of-appeal pro-se pro-se-appellant procedural-default |
1. Since the U.S, District Court has Subsequently Confirmed that, the Not/ce .
oF Appeal in question was, im fact, timely Filed, Should the Court
of A… |
| 21-8005 |
Mark M. Lowe v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-05-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 8th-amendment access-to-courts amendment-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights department-of-corrections due-process human-needs judicial-disqualification pro-se-appellant standing |
1. Whether the denial of basic human needs violates individual rights under the 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution.
2. W… |
| 19-6894 |
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2019-12-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ashe-v-swenson blockburger-v-united-states brown-v-ohio compounding-charges constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment pro-se-appellant successive-prosecution |
1. Whether State prosecuting an accused under pretense of successive prosecution
based upon temporally distinct conduct from prior prosecution, and co… |
| 18-5448 |
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-405(h) administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction pro-se pro-se-appellant social-security-administration standing stare-decisis tort tort-claim venue venue-jurisdiction |
Is the U.S. Federal District Court of Minnesota the appropriate venue and jurisdiction to present an Appeal for a suit Sounding in Tort against the So… |