No. 23-7007

Howard T. Tyson, Sr. v. Kris Y. Lee, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-03-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 7th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence-standard judicial-orders judicial-procedure motion-to-dismiss pleadings pro-se-appellant standing
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. WHY DOES THE COURTS FAIL TO FOLLOW OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME
COURT WICH SAYS. WHEN A PRO SE APPELLANT ARE FACES WITH A MOTION TO
DISMISS. IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE COURT TO CONCIDER MATERIAL OUTSIDE
OF THE COMPLAINT TO THE EXTENT. TO SEE IF THEY ARE CONSISTANT WITH ALL
ALLIGATIONS?

2. WHY DOESN'T A CIVIL CASE FILED WITH AN OVERWHELMING AMOUNT
OF FACTUAL EVIDENSE. THE EVIDENSE BEING IMPECABLE. SELDOM IS ALLOWED
A TRIAL BY JURY AS THE 7th AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION STATES?

3. WHY IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH JUDGES FAILING TO SIGN THEIR ORDERS
WHICH THE SIGNATURE IS A VERY SIGNIFICANT DOCUMENT. THERE IS A
HUGE PROBLEM IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

why-do-courts-fail-to-follow-supreme-court-opinions-on-pro-se-motions-to-dismiss

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-03-26
Waiver of right of respondent Kris Y. Lee to respond filed.
2024-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)

Attorneys

Howard T. Tyson
Howard T. Tyson Sr. — Petitioner
Kris Y. Lee
David Drake HudginsHudgins Law Firm, Respondent