1. Whether the Ninth Circuit has continued
to deny Due Process by applying a
purportedly categorical, Ramirez-
Aleiandre v. Ashcroft , 320 F.3d 858, 875
(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), argument
waiver / forfeiture rule allegedly
supported by Padgett u. Wright , 587 F.3d
983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009) to hundreds
of pro se appellants, a-la the secret policy
in Schexnavder u. Vannov . 140 S. Ct. 354
(U.S. 2019) (Sotomayor, J.), even after the
en banc Brown u. Arizona . 82 F. 4th 863,
873 (9th Cir. 2023) embraced this Court 's
reasoning in Yee u. Escondido . 503 U.S.
519, 534 (1992)?

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit amended the
original pre-filing review order (which
was the subject of the certiorari petition
No. 22-648) in a manner that denied
Lukashin Due Process by failing to
provide notice or opportunity to be heard
in opposition, representing a departure
"from the accepted and usual course of
judicial proceedings... to call for an
exercise of this Court 's supervisory
power " under Rule 10(a).

Whether the Ninth Circuit has continued to deny Due Process by applying a categorical argument waiver rule to pro se appellants, and whether the Ninth Circuit amended a pre-filing review order in a manner that denied Due Process