No. 21-646
Oklahoma v. Dameon Lamar Leathers
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-jurisdiction precedent-challenge stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-16
Brief of respondent Dameon L. Leathers in opposition filed.
2021-12-16
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Dameon L. Leathers.
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2021.
2021-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to December 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-24
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Dameon L. Leathers
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner