No. 18-1105
Samuel Pierce v. Yale University, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: affirmative-action civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection higher-education race-based-discrimination stare-decisis university-admissions
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court should overrule its holdings
in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
and Grutter v. Bollinger that professional school
admissions decisions are constitutionally protected
expression.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should overrule its holdings in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutier v. Bollinger that professional school admissions decisions are constitutionally protected expression
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-04
Waiver of right of respondents Yale University, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Association of American Medical Colleges to respond filed.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Samuel Pierce
Samuel Pierce — Petitioner
Yale University, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Association of American Medical Colleges
Noah J. Kaufman — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent