No. 21-798

Oklahoma v. Stephen Tanner Vineyard

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference: 2022-02-25
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled

Docket Entries

2022-02-28
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-01-20
Brief of respondent Stephen T. Vineyard in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2022-01-20
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Stephen T. Vineyard.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-12-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 20, 2022.
2021-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 30, 2021 to January 20, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2021-12-17
Brief amicus curiae of Chickasaw Nation filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2021-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceAppendix

Attorneys

Chickasaw Nation
Frank Sharp Holleman IV — Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Stephen T. Vineyard
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent