No. 21-252
Oklahoma v. Shannon James Kepler
Tags: court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-case criminal-law federal-indian-law legal-precedent mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-21
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-08
Brief amicus curiae of Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed.
2021-10-08
Brief of respondent Shannon J. Kepler in opposition filed.
2021-10-08
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Shannon J. Kepler.
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 20, 2021.
2021-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2021 to October 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Riyaz Amir Kanji — Kanji & Kantzen, PLLC, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Shannon J. Kepler
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent