How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding
without a Precedent for Stare Decisis? Will there be a Legislation of
The Law not being upheld by Precedents or Stare Decisis -- & If
unbinding to a Final Decision, what abridged an unabridged matter
of a precedent for what is held by Stare Decisis in a Legislated Law?

* What Constitute a Constitutional Matter if not by Law: Or a
Public Interest: a State or Federal Statute or rules for or against
Bridging...? The federal notice pleading standards for addressing
that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a
claims...which would entitle him to relief."... for constitutional
rights.

* Rule 35 only address the hearing or rehearing en banc, in the
7.22.21 decision, case no. JMC-20-636; why was there not a poll to
address the rehearing as petitioned, rule 35.a.2? Never was there a
hearing but informal briefs that was Petitioned for a rehearing &
rehearing en banc that was denied 9.24.21, case no. 21-1022.

* Contemporary vs. Popular vs. Ways of Caring. The Courts, The
People or Current Law ... The question here is Working with
Disabilities (ADA), than to be Wrongfully Terminated as a Disabled
Veteran from federal service. My question is, does the form js44
for case l:20cv- 00636jmc, 20-cv-00636-JKB establish a complaint;
inwhich case no.21-1022 denied as having no reversible error(s)?

* What is the uniform practice for Stare Decisis: Rule 35(a)(2) is of
exceptional importance if the 4th circuit is to continue to use mere
formalities to address issues from the lower courts on appeal in an
abridge matter?

* With the JS44 a conflict in this case; the request for Rehearing &
Rehearing En Banc on the question for which the 4th circuit had
denied case no. 21-1022, on the 7.22.21 decision in case no. 20-cv-
00636-jkb, that involves one or more exceptional importance on the
petition for Rehearing & Rehearing En banc as to the complaint that
was filed vs. what was adjudicated; 9.24.21.

* How is this issue final, if not binding? Is The Court's Opinion not
binding in all this, as to the Fed. Notice Pleading Standard?

* Note: Justia Case Law- For unconstitutionality of non-
precedential Appellate Rulings, the legal intelligencers for
contemporary findings or any findings for Binding Decisions in
today's Persuasive Values, for working with Disabilities or in the
mind, for a binding opinion to be constitutional. The consistent,
reasonably, with previous judicial decisions on the same subject.
...that say what about an unbinding decision, the rulings in case no.
20-00636-jkb that does not address the consistence for the js44 as
having a complaint. On its merit rule 45(b) to find favor; & a

How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis?