remand-order
15 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-631 | Jae S. Nah v. Andrew V. Jablon, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2025-12-03 | Pending | Response Waived | copyright-discovery due-process federal-jurisdiction fraud-on-courts judicial-procedure remand-order | 1. In this early stage of litigation, DC and Appeal courts ignored 1-188 pages of factual evidence showing 7 Orders of 4 federal courts ruled by fraud… |
| 25-327 | Express Scripts, Inc., et al. v. California | Ninth Circuit | 2025-09-18 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-procedure automatic-stay coinbase-precedent federal-officer-removal remand-order statutory-exception | Whether a remand order appealed under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), like the orders at issue in Coinbase, is subject to an automatic stay pending appeal. |
| 24-168 | Usha Jain, et vir v. Donald Myers, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2024-08-16 | Denied | due-process federal-removal jurisdictional-transfer remand-order statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent | Whether an endorsed remand order on a new subsequent federal removal case with new ground filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443, without issuance of a certifie… | |
| 22-73 | Usha Jain, et vir v. David Barker, et al. | Florida | 2022-07-26 | Denied | civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-removal federal-statute jurisdiction remand-order removal-jurisdiction standing state-court state-court-proceedings | This Court should resolve the question of the law, whether the state court's jurisdiction continues during the removal period and whether state court … | |
| 21-5625 | Phillip Shawn Horton v. United States | Fifth Circuit | 2021-09-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | case-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-interpretation legal-conflict procedural-review remand remand-order sentencing stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent | I. Should this Court should grant review to determine whether the opinion of the court below conflicts with this Court's decisions in Witte v. United … |
| 20-1651 | Michael J. DeMartini, et ux. v. Timothy P. DeMartini, et ux. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-05-26 | Denied | appellate-review circuit-split civil-procedure joinder remand remand-order removal statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction | (1) Whether an antecedent court order amending a complaint to join a diversity-destroying defendant is separable from a § 1447(e) remand order and thu… | |
| 20-1144 | Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. Curtis Ulleseit, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-02-22 | GVR | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights-removal court-of-appeals federal-officer-removal remand remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Under 28 U.S.C. 1447(d), courts of appeals generally may not review orders remanding removed cases to state court. But Section 1447(d) also states tha… |
| 20-884 | Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-01-04 | GVR | Relisted (2) | 28-usc-1442 28-usc-1447d appellate-review civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdictional-issue remand-order statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order when removal was premised in part on the federal-of… |
| 20-783 | Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2020-12-08 | GVR | Relisted (2) | appellate-review civil-rights-removal court-of-appeals federal-officer-removal jurisdiction remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… |
| 19-1189 | BP p.l.c., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore | Fourth Circuit | 2020-03-31 | Judgment Issued | Amici (20) | appellate-review civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdiction jurisdictional-limits remand remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… |
| 19-238 | In Re Hotze Health Wellness Center International One, LLC, et al. | 2019-08-23 | Denied | appellate-review article-iii-standing civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction en-banc-review proposition-65 remand-order removal standing subject-matter-jurisdiction supplemental-jurisdiction | (1) Whether the remand order constitutes an appealable abuse of discretion for failing to reach or resolve the jurisdictional issues raised below. (2… | ||
| 19-226 | Noel L. Smith v. Diane Smith Carusos | Second Circuit | 2019-08-20 | Denied | abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-jurisdiction due-process judicial-procedure legal-ethics procedural-due-process remand remand-order removal standing subject-matter-jurisdiction | Does a U.S. District Court have subject-matter jurisdiction to grant a motion that admittedly has never been served? Does a U.S. Court of Appeals hav… | |
| 19-140 | Jason Edward Rheinstein v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland | Fourth Circuit | 2019-07-30 | Rehearing | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-jurisdiction attorney-discipline circuit-split civil-procedure federal-courts federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure judicial-review remand remand-order removal standing statutory-interpretation | Whether, once an appeal of a remand order has been explicitly authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the en… |
| 18A1285 | Jason Edward Rheinstein v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland | Fourth Circuit | 2019-06-10 | Presumed Complete | 28-usc-1447d appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review circuit-split federal-jurisdiction remand-order | Question not identified. | |
| 18-502 | William Kinney, et ux. v. Anderson Lumber Company, Inc. | Sixth Circuit | 2018-10-18 | Denied | attorney-misconduct civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction first-amendment fraud post-removal-statute remand remand-order removal vacatur | Does the post removal statute, Title 28 Section 1447, bar the vacatur of a remand order obtained by attorney misconduct and fraud? Plaintiffs were uns… |