No. 19-140
Jason Edward Rheinstein v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction attorney-discipline circuit-split civil-procedure federal-courts federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure judicial-review remand remand-order removal standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, once an appeal of a remand order has been explicitly authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the entire order and all of the legal issues entailed in the decision to remand, as the majority of circuits to consider the issue had previously held, or whether the appellate court's jurisdiction to review a remand order is limited to the portion of the remand order addressing particular issues as the Fourth Circuit held in this case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the entire remand order or only the portion addressing particular issues
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-11-10
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-30
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland to respond filed.
2019-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 29, 2019)
2019-06-11
Application (18A1285) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 25, 2019.
2019-06-07
Application (18A1285) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 9, 2019 to July 25, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
Michele Joan McDonald — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jason Edward Rheinstein
Jason Edward Rheinstein — Petitioner