No. 19-412
Peggy A. Cianchette, et al. v. Tucker J. Cianchette, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process ex-post-facto fair-notice judicial-review judicial-rules legal-precedent punitive-damages remand-standard stare-decisis tort-law
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, when an appellate court overturns its own controlling precedent, constitutional guarantees of due process require remand to the trial court for application of the newly-adopted rule of law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Constitution requires remand when an appellate court overturns its own precedent
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-27
Waiver of right of respondents Tucker J. Cianchette, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)
Attorneys
PET, LLC, et al.
David Asher Swetnam-Burland — Brann & Isaacson, Petitioner
Tucker J. Cianchette, et al.
TImothy H. Norton — Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, Respondent