No. 24-6267
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review court-of-appeals judicial-precedent legal-doctrine stare-decisis supervisory-power
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should this Court exercise its supervisory power to clearly establish what is meant by "stare decisis", where the New York State Court of Appeals sanctioned the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department of New York State's departure from the doctrine of stare decisis by denying Petitioner leave to appeal?
Should an indictment conform with statutory criteria and provisions, by asserting facts supporting every element of the offense charged?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court exercise its supervisory power to clearly establish what is meant by stare decisis, where the New York State Court of Appeals sanctioned the Appellate Division's departure from the doctrine?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-21
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2025)
Attorneys
New York
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Robert Moore
Robert Moore — Petitioner