Legislative Goals

Quincy Magee has ownership of Quincy Magee's Companies Properties and Names Renaissance Media Productions - Aesthetic Media Productions - AMP, and fair compensation for his works licensed or purchased. Establish the working capital and cash flow to continue maximizing in the development of his companies and properties as he considers taking his company public as he expands further into consumer products (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling) "A statement in regards to a "single asset" is sufficient to determine ones ability to repay and or extend credit, discharge tax debt. If this statement is untrue the statement can not be used to write off the bad debt. (Compliant with Dodd Frank and Sarbanes Oxley if recognized by commercial banks)

Ensure companies negotiate with employees in regards to the use of intellectual property, when the works are created prior to being hired and the works are outside the scope of the position for which they were hired. (Lamar, Archer & Cofrmn, LLP v. Appling) In discharging the debt, Harvard Business School endorsed Quincy Magee's financial statements, but Harvard Business School may have attempted to accept payment from a third party to obscure their financial liability, as corroborated by the request to sign the media release form.

"The House Report on the [Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978] suggests that Congress wanted to moderate the burden on individuals who submitted false financial statements, not because lies about financial condition are less blameworthy than others, but because the relative equities might be affected by practices of consumer finance companies, which sometimes have encouraged such falsity by their borrowers for the very purpose of insulating their own claims from discharge"

Copyrights and Patents continue to be an important commercial instruments to spur economic investment and finance the supply chain especially in global markets which are very developed. The obscurity of the credit market and the discretion which banks have in lending creates increased barriers to entry for entities which require development in access to capital. This combined with liquid institutional credit markets and compulsive private equity, has further attempted to skew the perception of revenues to larger banks. Furthermore, Quincy Magee worked at many of the companies where the infringement occurred including Sony BMG (2006), and EMI (2005) bartering his time for the right of way. For these reasons intellectual property rights must be honored. (Lamar, Archer & Cofrmn, LLP v. Appling) A statement in regards to a "single asset" is sufficient to determine ones ability to repay and or extend credit, discharge tax debt if asset cannot be recovered, without closure allowing an accurate allocation of credit, assuming credit it extended in good faith and not based on fraudulent information, or intentions.

Prevent companies from using law enforcement from, either directly or through proxy, using persons engaged in "otherwise illegal activity" to commit crimes against business owners and entrepreneurs in attempts at unlawful search and seizure, extortion, advanced interrogation, burglary, and control fraud. (Azar v. Garza) Removing the injury does not preclude damages incurred by negligence, especially in circumstance where the effects or damages have yet to be fully understood or assessed.

This is considered attempted felony hate crime or attempted discrimination, attempted defamation, attempting to un-rightfully give the authorities not clients more control of what business are established. (Azar v. Garza)

Quincy Magee does not believe that the Civil Justice System should be complicit or aide and abate the fraud Quincy Magee is reporting by violating the courts Rules of Custody. Since entering

Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging copyright infringement, patent infringement, and fraud