Is it a question of law, for the District Court and/or the Appeals Court judges to unjustly violate a Pro Se litigant's procedural due process, or violate a Pro Se litigant's right under the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution to a jury trial, while inappropriately applying the pleading standards established by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), to destroy all economic value of Pro Se litigant's valid intellectual property rights, i.e. patents?

Is it a question of law for the District Court and/or the Appeals Court judges to unjustly violate a Pro Se litigant's procedural due process or violate a Pro Se litigant's right under the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution to a jury trial, while inappropriately applying the pleading standards established by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, to destroy all economic value of Pro Se litigant's valid intellectual property rights, i.e. patents?