No. 23-6198
William Plummer v. Wellpath, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech incarceration medical-parole patent prisoner-rights standing state-law
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in construing the patent claims at issue
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-09
Waiver of right of respondents Kim Smith; Gary Prinkey; Essonno; Superintendent Overmeyer; Dorina Varner; Keri Moore; Joseph Silva; William Sutherland; Derek F. Oberlander to respond filed.
2023-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Kim Smith; Gary Prinkey; Essonno; Superintendent Overmeyer; Dorina Varner; Keri Moore; Joseph Silva; William Sutherland; Derek F. Oberlander
Daniel Barrett Mullen — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
William Plummer
William Plummer — Petitioner