No. 19-58
Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor Corporation, dba KLA-Tencor, Inc.
Tags: antitrust-law appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split federal-circuit fifth-circuit jurisdiction patent patent-fraud summary-judgment walker-process
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process claims lie in the regional circuits, or in the Federal Circuit?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process claims lie in the regional circuits, or in the Federal Circuit?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-05
Reply of petitioner Xitronix Corporation filed.
2019-08-23
Brief of respondent KLA-Tencor Corporation, DBA KLA-Tencor, Inc. in opposition filed.
2019-08-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2019.
2019-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2019)
Attorneys
KLA-Tencor Corporation, DBA KLA-Tencor, Inc.
Aaron Gabriel Fountain — DLA Piper LLP (US), Respondent
Xitronix Corporation
Adam G. Unikowsky — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner