No. 18-1170
Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor Corporation, dba KLA-Tencor, Incorporated
Tags: antitrust antitrust-law appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split federal-circuit jurisdiction patent patent-fraud regional-circuits sherman-act subject-matter-jurisdiction walker-process
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process claims lie in the regional circuits, or in the Federal Circuit?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process antitrust claims involving patent fraud lies in the regional circuits, not the Federal Circuit
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-30
Rescheduled.
2019-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-10
Reply of petitioner Xitronix Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-24
Brief of respondent KLA-Tencor Corporation, DBA KLA-Tencor, Inc. in opposition filed.
2019-05-24
Response Requested. (Due June 24, 2019)
2019-05-23
Letter of petitioner dated May 23, 2019, received.
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Letter of petitioner dated May 10, 2019, received.
2019-03-21
Supplemental brief of petitioner Xitronix Corporation filed.
2019-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 8, 2019.
2019-03-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 8, 2019 to May 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
KLA-Tencor Corporation, DBA KLA-Tencor, Inc.
Aaron Gabriel Fountain — DLA Piper LLP (US), Respondent
James M. Heintz — DLA Piper LLP (US), Respondent
Xitronix Corporation
Adam G. Unikowsky — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner