No. 19-1012
General Electric Company v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation, fka United Technologies Corporation
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: article-iii article-iii-standing civil-procedure civil-rights competition competitive-harm competitor-standing due-process inter-partes-review judicial-precedent patent patent-infringement patent-law standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Antitrust Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Antitrust Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether competitive harm alone suffices to confer Article III standing to appeal an IPR determination, or whether an appellant must also show concrete plans for future activity that creates a substantial risk of a future patent infringement action.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether competitive harm alone suffices to confer Article III standing to appeal an IPR determination, or whether an appellant must also show concrete plans for future activity that creates a substantial risk of a future patent infringement action
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-05
Reply of petitioner General Electric Company filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-15
Brief of respondent Raytheon Technologies Corporation, fka United Technologies Corporation in opposition filed.
2020-04-10
Letter of April 6, 2020, received from counsel for the respondent.
2020-03-16
Brief amicus curiae of Frontier Communications Corporation filed.
2020-03-16
Brief amici curiae of Unified Patents, LLC; Engine Advocacy; Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.; The R Street Institute; and The Niskanen Center filed.
2020-03-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 15, 2020.
2020-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 16, 2020 to April 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2020)
2020-01-06
Application (19A727) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 12, 2020.
2019-12-31
Application (19A727) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2020 to February 12, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Frontier Communications Corporation
Paul R. Garcia — Amicus
General Electric Company
Gregory George Garre — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Taylor Ann Rausch Meehan — Bartlit Beck LLP, Respondent
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, fka United Technologies Corporation
Michael John Valaik — Bartlit Beck LLP, Respondent
Unified Patents, LLC; Engine Advocacy; Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.; The R Street Institute; and The Niskanen Center
Ruthanne Mary Deutsch — Deutsch Hunt, PLLC, Amicus