IS IT ABUSE OF DISCRETEON WHEN PLEA OFFER IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY LAW.

IS IT ABUSE OF DISCRETON WHEN HABEAS TREAL COURT DOES NOT FOLLOW APPELL ATE PROCEDUNES AND THE DUA COURSE OF LAW OF JUDICIAL PROCESS.

IS IT ABISE OF DISCRSITEON WHEN HABEAS TREAL COURT DONOT A FINDINGS OF RELEVANT FACTORS, IF ZTS ORDER TO DO SO,BY FEGLAR COULT.

IS IT,A FIFTH AMENDMENT VZOLATEON IF PLEA BARGAZN IS ENNANGED WETHOUT JUSTE FZATZON, NO NOTICE TO EN HANCE:

IS ZT A SIXTH AMENDMENT VZOLATZON WHEN A PLEA OFFER IS NOT LOMM. UNICATE TO PETETEONEN DUNAN TRAL, AND FAZLURE TO INVESTEGATE OR OBJECT TO PREOR CONVELIZONS, (INEFECTIVE ASSESTANGE OF COUNEL. THAT WERENOT IN ZNDICTMED

IS =TA EIGHTH AMENDMENT VEOLATEUN WHEN PLEA BARGAIN OFFER IS WELL ABOVE RANE SET FORTH By LEGISLATURE: AWD THE STATUTORY RANE OF PUNESHMENT FOR CHARGE OFFENSE, AND NOT AUTUORZZED BY LAW.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNZSHMA

IS IT A FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATEON IF TREAL HABEAS COUNT VIOLATES THE FOUNDAMENTAL FAZRNESS OF DUE PROCESS AND FQUAL PROTECTZON RZCUTS, AND TE HABEAS COURT DOES NOT FOLLO TU: DUE COURSE OF LAW IN JUDZCZAL PROCEEDZNGS.

IS IT PROSECUTZON MESCONDEAT WHEN THENE IS NO MOTZON TO INTKNT TO ENHANCE AND INTER FEVEDENCE OF PEN-PACK WHILE ASKINL JURY TO STEP OUT OF COURT ROOM WHELE JUDGE SEGN'S DOCUMIENT AFTER PIETEONER'S TREAL.

IS IT A MESCARRZALE OF JUSTICEINEGLECTE'S THE LELAL AND FTHZCAL RESPONSZBILITEES TO UP HOLD TH LAW WEN THE HABEAS JUDGE ALLOWN'S ANOTUE PERSON TO ADURESS THE REMANYS TO CURR A VZOLATEON OF LNRTED STATS CONSTITUTZON WHEN THAT PRSON DOESNOT HAVE AUTHORZTY TO DO SO.

OF OFFENSE AND ENMANCEMENT IN RE-INSTATEMENT UF PLEA OFFEN TO CURE A SZKTH AMENDMENT VZOATZON, USED FOR REMEDY,

IS IT CONTEPT WLEN NABEAS COUNT DO NOT COMPLY WETH ORDER.

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the First Amendment's free speech protections