No. 18-7939

In Re Daniel Eric Salley

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-02-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus patent standing statutory-interpretation supervisory-powers
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the district court failed to
Perform it's ministerial duties pursuant to 28
U.S. C. 3636()()(Band(), and Fed,R. Civ. P 6(a)
by not Computing
Time according to the
statute and therety
not perform De nova Review
and Determination; and whether the appellate
sanctioned such failure and thes volate
count
it's
own mandate pursuant to Article II
of
the Constitution of the United states and the
supervisory
cout's
powerse

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court failed to properly apply 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) and (c), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a) by not computing time according to the statute and thereby not perform de novo review and determinations, and whether the appellate court sanctioned such failure and thus violated its own mandate pursuant to Article III of the Constitution of the United States and the court's supervisory powers

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent united states to respond filed.
2019-01-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Daniel Eric Salley
Daniel E. Salley — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent