MUST BE SETASIDE?

conviction oftthined from an perury

Question daro. toes the scotus precednt still hold that aftaaid fom a warrntless pristected search

Question Ihree. Jice many innocent defendant have been using junk beience" evidene wrongly convicted by tha Itater suling denouncing the use of unk Science" to of tainwrong ner's Case?

Question Four. Shouldit the scotus apply it uling is Mc Quggin 4. Perkins, 5694d 133 8.Ct.1924 (2013 to etitins GRANTING Petitiones Clan of Actual Sanocence

QUESTion FNe. Potitioner Liled Orplica tion Forbirth of Hahis Corans based on O til Mo "unk 8cienne" a lleaation Tha trial judhe Hon lokn badlock sined that as CoM: the Jevas Foresua OPigeron Scence Con laburtiry analysis to challnge the initiol ravert auklisth Iati Dit exan" Loie Pattou Patton that wa baned on "Junk Soiavce thslnolay and arevatol cerin Shoull the Conus aperune thasa Crslieathime as ported to the ove nOMeLE

DiTd 8 EACTUAL DOCUMENEAQULESTION SIX. bthimss Tions that onoue sthutimval ralt umder the lst 4th 5th, bath, aud uth Amndeente Ith. 1. 8. Constithtin egresinaly wolatl by the Sthe and rmlted in Peti Shald the Scatus exercse Liern & ito anthalit, and corrastt thiN MANIEEST MISCARRIAGE OE JusTIce and CoRanT Patitiomens claina Athal cauch

Whether the lower courts correctly applied the standard for granting a writ of certiorari under SCOTUS Rule 10