35-usc-102

4 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
22-544 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al. Federal Circuit 2022-12-14 Denied Response Waived 35-usc-102 anticipation anticipatory-reference clear-and-convincing clear-and-convincing-evidence invention patent patent-infringement patent-invalidity prior-art In Washburn & Moen Mfg. Co. v. Beat 'Em All Barbed-Wire Co., 143 U.S. 275 (1892) (also known as "Barbed Wire Patent"), the Court found the burden to e…
22-11 SawStop Holding LLC v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. Federal Circuit 2022-07-05 Denied Response Waived 35-usc-101 35-usc-102 35-usc-103 judicial-authority non-statutory-double-patenting patent patent-eligibility patent-law statutory-interpretation ultra-vires The Patent Act adopted by Congress provides that a person shall be entitled to a patent if an invention meets three conditions: the eligibility condit…
18-1072 James J. Macor v. United States Patent and Trademark Office Federal Circuit 2019-02-15 Denied Response Waived 35-usc-102 35-usc-103 administrative-law analogous-art obviousness obviousness-standard patent patent-examination patent-law prior-art statutory-interpretation In making rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious, what standard should be applied in determining whether prior art is "analogous," and, if the…
18-109 Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc. Federal Circuit 2018-07-24 Denied CVSGAmici (3)Response WaivedRelisted (2) 35-usc-102 35-usc-119 disclosure federal-circuit filing-date patent patent-application patent-law patent-prior-art prior-art priority subject-matter Do unclaimed disclosures in a published patent application and an earlier application it relies on for priority enter the public domain and thus becom…