patent-application
6 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-6217 | Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co., et al. | Third Circuit | 2024-12-31 | Denied | IFP | constitutional-rights federal-court patent-application procedural-action state-court subject-matter-jurisdiction | QUESTION I: Whether a federal court has the Subject-Matter Jurisdiction under any law of the United States to "Order " and "Adjudge " that a State Cou… |
| 20-1126 | Joachim Carlo Santos Martillo, et al. v. Unknown Defendants | Massachusetts | 2021-02-17 | Denied | 35-usc-145 35-usc-261 adverse-possession federal-circuit patent-application patent-ownership property-rights quiet-title standing-doctrine try-title uspto-procedure | Does a party asserting ownership to a patent application have a right to a state (commonwealth) action like either a Massachusetts quiet action or a M… | |
| 18-961 | Mitchell R. Swartz v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. | Federal Circuit | 2019-01-24 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | 35-usc-145 35-usc-section-145 administrative-law civil-rights due-process evidence evidence-review judicial-procedure patent patent-application patent-law-35-usc-145 patent-office standing takings | Has The Court Erred by not being consistent with Decisions of this court Regarding The Requirement of 35 U.S.C. §145 Claims (Count 1) to Address the N… |
| 18-801 | Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. NantKwest, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2018-12-21 | Judgment Issued | Amici (11)Relisted (2) | 35-usc-145 administrative-law civil-action civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit judicial-review patent patent-act patent-application patent-law personnel-expenses standing statutory-interpretation uspto USPTO-litigation | Whether the phrase "[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings" in 35 U.S.C. 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the USPTO incurs when its employees, in… |
| 18-371 | George M. Wang v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office | Federal Circuit | 2018-09-21 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-101 additional-features alice-corp-v-cls-bank inventive-concept mayo-v-prometheus patent-application patent-claims patent-community patent-eligibility patent-protection phonetic-symbol-system useful-invention | Whether the claims of the very useful invention contain "additional features" embodying an inventive concept that makes the invention patent-eligible. |
| 18-109 | Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2018-07-24 | Denied | CVSGAmici (3)Response WaivedRelisted (2) | 35-usc-102 35-usc-119 disclosure federal-circuit filing-date patent patent-application patent-law patent-prior-art prior-art priority subject-matter | Do unclaimed disclosures in a published patent application and an earlier application it relies on for priority enter the public domain and thus becom… |