No. 21-7564

Armstead Kieffer v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process federal-jurisdiction fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech patent sixth-amendment standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) Does the Unconstitutionally Vague language, Struck down by the Court in 185 O.G.), apply to 18USC F22¢gyG)?

(2) May a Stipulation Suffice To Convey Federal Jurisdiction When the Government fails to Provide the Cert Freate, To Prove The federally Insured Status, AS required by [BASC 211 3a) and I G)?

(3) ace Hhe Sixth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment Guarantee et; troner the right B® aveid Jamprisormen? ender Unconstitutional Procedures?

(4) Moy Hhe Government Consistent with the Fourth Amendment Utilize (h loranat ore esally Seized From a Fi Vex. Te. celf Shove, Wi thoef a Court order?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the unconstitutionally vague language, struck down by the Court in 185 OG, violates 35 USC 112(b)

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Armstead Kieffer
Armstead Kieffer — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent